Justice For All Malaysia

Bad situation for Kuantan Taxi drivers, too

Posted on: September 17, 2007

Why pay RM80 for a RM1 check?

By : Marc Lourdes

KUALA LUMPUR: Taxi drivers want to know why they have to pay RM80 for a medical check-up at a panel clinic, when they can get the same examination for RM1 at a government hospital.

Under a new scheme to increase public service vehicle safety in the wake of the Bukit Gantang bus crash, the Road Transport Department has introduced mandatory health screening for all public service vehicle (PSV) licences, goods driving licences (GDL) and conductor licence (KON) holders.

Yesterday, the Wilayah Persekutuan Taxi Owners and Drivers Association, the Kuala Lumpur Taxi Workers Association and the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Radio Taxi Association, which together represent about 3,000 cabbies, slammed the RTD’s eKesihatan scheme for placing yet another financial burden on taxi drivers.

Cheras MP Tan Kok Wai, who chaired the news conference, said: “The tests cost RM80, the equivalent of two days income for the drivers, and they have to pay it out of their own pockets.”

He said it would be better to allow them to go to a government hospital where they could undergo all the tests for RM1.
Wilayah Persekutuan Taxi Owners and Drivers Association secretary Hiew Pow Man said the eKesihatan scheme was redundant because PSV licence holders already had to go for a physical when they renewed their licences.

Previously, they paid RM50 for new applications and RM10 for renewals.

Asked to comment, RTD deputy director-general Solah Mat Hassan said the department had no objections to taxi drivers going to government hospitals for their check-ups, “provided the hospitals can link up with our online eKesihatan system and submit the medical reports to us”.

The associations are trying to meet with Transport Minister Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy in the next two weeks to ask for a waiver of the RM80 fee if the ministry insists on going ahead with the eKesihatan scheme, scheduled to begin on Oct 1.

The scheme had also raised some eyebrows in the medical fraternity.

The Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) questioned the selection of Supremme Systems as the gateway provider for the programme, and called on its members not to accept the appointment as panel clinic for the eKesihatan programme until further discussions with RTD.

Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Associations Malaysia president Dr Steven Chow said doctors were not in favour of the scheme.



1 Response to "Bad situation for Kuantan Taxi drivers, too"

Hey, don’t you know economics? Private companies are more effecient than the government. Look at the RTD, after so many years of screwing it up, they finally decided to do something smart and let a private company handle it. Do you honestly think that you can get a good and complete medical check up for RM 1 at a government hospital? The doctors at the government hospital are already overworked, Do you honestly think that they will do a comprehensive and complete medical check up?? Think of the next time you sit in a taxi or bus would you put your life in the hands of an unfit driver who has has been allowed to drive. Its because of people like you who do not understand that Malaysia has one of the highest number of road accidents IN THE WORLD!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Must Attend Program

Please go to this link: https://justice4allkuantan.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/invitation-public-forum-the-isa-and-the-police-reform-process-whats-next-after-pak-lah/
To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards of people - Emily Cox

Siphoning EPF money

On 'Why should Valuecap borrow from EPF?' Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud: MTUC condemns the government's move to bail out Valuecap to support the local stock market using RM5 billion from EPF, as the provident fund is the custodian of the workers' money and not some sort of ‘automated teller machine' for the government.
If at all the EPF were to lend its money to the government, it has to be under the condition that there be transparency and accountability in the activities for which the money has been purposed. We want to know who is doing what with the money that belongs to the workers. This is the hard-earned money of the workers, their retirement plan. How is this bailout plan going to benefit the workers? We also question the reason for this bailout. If the economic fundamentals in Malaysia are strong and reserves sufficient as has been stated several times by the government, then why is there a need to offer so much money to the GLCs? Second Finance Minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop should prove how the EPF would profit from this loan. Bernama had reported that Nor had given the assurance that the loan given out by EPF would reap profits for the fund judging from Valuecap's past performance. But where is the paperwork and calculations to show that this move will benefit the EPF? MTUC is concerned that the loan might be mismanaged or misused and this, in turn, would affect the returns for the contributors. Mere assurances are not enough. We want to proof that this RM5 billion will not go down the drain. (The writer is president, MTUC). Sharyn: The government wants to use our pension money to prop up the Malaysian stock market which is the playing field of the rich people. If so, the government must ensure that the EPF account holders - who are predominantly the poor to average citizens of Malaysia - be guaranteed all of our pension money with a compound 8% growth (interest). It's so selfish and sick of the government to use the poor's pension money to help the rich to make more money with all the risks taken by the poor/average citizen. We can better use the RM% billion loans to Valuecap for our children's education, shelter, medical bills etc. Why not get those rich people to prop up the share market instead? Why should they park their money overseas and gamble with our EPF money instead? Kumar14: Who is behind this Valuecap organisation? Why suddenly, this separate entity is allowed to access funds from the EPF? Are they capable enough to handle it or is it just another desperate and blind move? It has been a very infamous trend where the people's funds are channeled to a company for investment purposes and suddenly POP! the funds disappear and there is nobody to be held responsible but a RM2 shell company. Charge who? Sue whom? The RM2 company (just a registered name)? We have seen this many times. People in power and with connections allow such things to go through and reap/rob the people's wealth and then blame it on organisations which actually don't exist. What if a lot of EPF funds are looted via such scams and nobody is to be pointed at? Where will the government get the funds to replenish the EPF? The people are very bored, disappointed, angry and frustrated at seeing all these dumb and unaccounted for measures being allowed by the government with lame excuses. Please, somebody verify the true purpose, integrity and capability of anybody attempting to use the people's fund.

Raja Petra

Photobucket Ihsan dari blog Go!Malaysian http://gomalaysian.blogspot.com/


A prosperous future is indivisible from a firm commitment to the principles of distributive justice, the rule of law and a profound respect for human rights.

Email Address:



September 2007
« Aug   Oct »

Blog Stats

  • 117,854 hits
%d bloggers like this: