Justice For All Malaysia

The Lingam Tape:Businessman goes public

Posted on: January 12, 2008

K Kabilan & Steven Gan | Jan 12, 08 11:32pm
Businessman Loh Mui Fah today disclosed that it was his son who had recorded the Lingam tape, finally putting to rest the question of the controversial clip’s authenticity.

The grainy 14-minute clip, made public last September, depicted lawyer VK Lingam having a phone conversation on the appointment of friendly judges with ex-chief justice Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim.

However, Loh was quick to point out that he did not release the video clip to PKR, the opposition party which exposed the controversial clip.

“It could have been my son, or my lawyers or any of my staff,” he told Malaysiakini in an exclusive interview at a secret location in Kuala Lumpur tonight.

“The phone conversation took place in late December 2001,” said the 58-year-old businessman, who also claimed that he was going public now because he fears for his life.

Loh said that he and his son were at Lingam’s house for dinner and when he asked the lawyer who it was that he was talking to on the phone and Lingam said it was Ahmad Fairuz.

Malaysiakini met Loh at his lawyer’s 9th floor posh apartment in an upmarket residency in the city.

Wearing a light blue collarless shirt with a black jacket and a pair of shades, Loh said that he was not aware that his son, Jwo Burne, 27, had made the recording.

“My son had a powerful camera which had recording facilities. He was taking photographs of Lingam, his house, his dog and all. I was not even aware that he had recorded Lingam’s phone conversation,” said Loh, who was coy about his business ventures apart from saying that it involved IT and forestry.

He said that he was only aware of the existence of the video clip after it was released to the public by PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim.

The clip, said Loh, was made on Dec 21, 2001 when both father and son visited Lingam to discuss a legal matter.

Recorded with high-end camera

He said that he had known Lingam from the mid-90s and had sought legal advice from the lawyer every now and then.

“But he was always busy, having no time to attend to our matter. So he invited us for dinner to his house so that we can discuss our matter,” he said, without disclosing what legal issues they were to discuss.

Sipping a glass of red wine, Loh said that he was at Lingam’s house from 7pm to 11pm that day, adding that even then the lawyer was constantly on the telephone.

“He had so many incoming calls. And then, there was this phone call… my son was taking photographs and when Lingam ended the call, I asked him who it was, to which he said ‘Ahmad Fairuz’,” said Loh.

“My son and I had no idea that he was talking to Ahmad Fairuz. My son had no intention or knowledge of whom he was talking to. Only at the end of the call, when I asked, we knew it was Ahmad Fairuz.”

He said that he was “not pleased” when he discovered that his son had recorded the phone call. He was also similarly “not pleased to see it released publicly”.

“I don’t know who released it to PKR. I didn’t give it to them, I also did not consent for it to be released,” he said.

His entire interview with Malaysiakini was also recorded by a member of his staff using a camera.

When pressed further if he knew who released the video clip, Loh merely said that it could be anyone – from his son to a member of his staff.

“It is best for my son to answer as to why he taped it and if he released the video clip,” he said, adding that Jwo Burne was however currently working in Shanghai, China.

“No, I didn’t ask him if he released the tape…,” said Loh.

Willing to testify

Loh added that Jwo Burne, the eldest of three boys, was willing to come and testify at the royal commission which will kick off its inquiry into the Lingam tape on Monday.

‘But he must be duly informed and given sufficient notice,” he said in the interview which lasted for about 70 minutes.

Loh himself is also willing to appear before the royal commission to confirm that the conversation which Lingam had on the telephone did take place.

“I can confirm that, but I have no way of ascertaining that it was Ahmad Fairuz at the other end. I have only what Lingam told me,” he said.

However, he said he had yet to be called to appear before the commission.

Loh also said that he was approached by PKR seeking his support for the video clip but revealed that he was not eager to help them.

“I was reluctant. I didn’t agree with it. Also why get involved in it. I told them to leave me alone,” he said.

He also added that PKR did not tell him of how and through whom they got the video clip.

Loh further said that after the recording was made public, Lingam had written to him, seeking a meeting.

“I disagreed to go to his office. Apart from the letters, I have not spoken to him at all,” he said.

The Lingam tape sparked a public uproar and called into question the integrity of the judiciary. The government in December formed a five-member royal commission to probe into the matter.

When the phone conversation took place, Ahmad Fairuz was the Chief Judge of Malaya, the judiciary No 3 post. He recently retired as the country’s top judge.

Q&A: My son recorded the Lingam tape


1 Response to "The Lingam Tape:Businessman goes public"

Loh says that he wrote to the Prime Miniser and he got NO Response!! Now what is so shocking , surprising or disappointing about that.

Hindraf wrote a whole lot of other letters adn memorandums and also got no response.

It had to take a rally on the 25th November 2007 of almost or over 30,000 Indians who stood their ground in the face of chemically laced water canons, rallies of tear gas canister that were returned to the police shooting them, one or two skirmishes and a little blood here and there before this Prime Minister would comment. Even then he only commented on what he figured to be a “blatant lie”, when he pointed out Hindraf’s reference to Ethnic Cleansing. Never mind that ethnic cleansing was not defined by Hindraf.

Now Loh Mui Fah has not done anything like what Hindraf has done. What right has he got to expect any response from the Prime Minister?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Must Attend Program

Please go to this link: https://justice4allkuantan.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/invitation-public-forum-the-isa-and-the-police-reform-process-whats-next-after-pak-lah/
To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards of people - Emily Cox

Siphoning EPF money

On 'Why should Valuecap borrow from EPF?' Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud: MTUC condemns the government's move to bail out Valuecap to support the local stock market using RM5 billion from EPF, as the provident fund is the custodian of the workers' money and not some sort of ‘automated teller machine' for the government.
If at all the EPF were to lend its money to the government, it has to be under the condition that there be transparency and accountability in the activities for which the money has been purposed. We want to know who is doing what with the money that belongs to the workers. This is the hard-earned money of the workers, their retirement plan. How is this bailout plan going to benefit the workers? We also question the reason for this bailout. If the economic fundamentals in Malaysia are strong and reserves sufficient as has been stated several times by the government, then why is there a need to offer so much money to the GLCs? Second Finance Minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop should prove how the EPF would profit from this loan. Bernama had reported that Nor had given the assurance that the loan given out by EPF would reap profits for the fund judging from Valuecap's past performance. But where is the paperwork and calculations to show that this move will benefit the EPF? MTUC is concerned that the loan might be mismanaged or misused and this, in turn, would affect the returns for the contributors. Mere assurances are not enough. We want to proof that this RM5 billion will not go down the drain. (The writer is president, MTUC). Sharyn: The government wants to use our pension money to prop up the Malaysian stock market which is the playing field of the rich people. If so, the government must ensure that the EPF account holders - who are predominantly the poor to average citizens of Malaysia - be guaranteed all of our pension money with a compound 8% growth (interest). It's so selfish and sick of the government to use the poor's pension money to help the rich to make more money with all the risks taken by the poor/average citizen. We can better use the RM% billion loans to Valuecap for our children's education, shelter, medical bills etc. Why not get those rich people to prop up the share market instead? Why should they park their money overseas and gamble with our EPF money instead? Kumar14: Who is behind this Valuecap organisation? Why suddenly, this separate entity is allowed to access funds from the EPF? Are they capable enough to handle it or is it just another desperate and blind move? It has been a very infamous trend where the people's funds are channeled to a company for investment purposes and suddenly POP! the funds disappear and there is nobody to be held responsible but a RM2 shell company. Charge who? Sue whom? The RM2 company (just a registered name)? We have seen this many times. People in power and with connections allow such things to go through and reap/rob the people's wealth and then blame it on organisations which actually don't exist. What if a lot of EPF funds are looted via such scams and nobody is to be pointed at? Where will the government get the funds to replenish the EPF? The people are very bored, disappointed, angry and frustrated at seeing all these dumb and unaccounted for measures being allowed by the government with lame excuses. Please, somebody verify the true purpose, integrity and capability of anybody attempting to use the people's fund.

Raja Petra

Photobucket Ihsan dari blog Go!Malaysian http://gomalaysian.blogspot.com/


A prosperous future is indivisible from a firm commitment to the principles of distributive justice, the rule of law and a profound respect for human rights.

Email Address:



January 2008
« Dec   Feb »

Blog Stats

  • 117,799 hits
%d bloggers like this: