Justice For All Malaysia

Fuziah Salleh: Facing the Press

Posted on: February 20, 2008

Fuziah Salleh had exposed today the following inexcusable “uncleaned” electoral roll by SPR.


First, a person on the SPR online list was registered to be born in 1885.

As printed from the SPR online website:

Kad Pengenalan : 851118065738 / 0264520


Tahun Lahir : 1885

Jantina : P

Lokaliti : 083 / 14 / 02 / 009 – MEDAN TOK SIRA

Daerah Mengundi : 083 / 14 / 02 – MEDAN TOK SIRA

DUN : 083 / 14 – TERUNTUM

Parlimen : 083 – KUANTAN

Negeri : PAHANG


Saluran : 1

Masa Mengundi : 08.00 PAGI – 05.00 PETANG

No Siri : 1

SPR hard copy electoral list sold to KeADILan Kuantan had only Habsah Bt Ali’s address as Medan Tok Sira. There was no way of discovering where she actually lived in Medan Tok Sira because SPR had deliberately taken out a column that gave the street name of her address.

Secondly, a person who had NEVER registered as a voter found his name on the electoral list when he “played” with the SPR online Electoral checking.

Thirdly, a person named with a BIN was registered as a woman, though it is clearly a “he”.

Then on another occasion, the same name appeared, registered correctly as a man.

The law that said such inappropriateness cannot be challenged after an electoral roll is gazzetted is truly against the spirit of justice and fair play in any election.

It was an utter concern that the electoral roll is not “cleaned” at all and that the risk of the roll to be different on polling day was very high as evidenced from the SPR online which at any time may be different from the hard copy sold to the party.

There was no assurance from SPR that each of the page of the hard copy sold had valid names, and not irregularities as shown above, for the 12th general Election.


Some of the press present. 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Must Attend Program

Please go to this link: https://justice4allkuantan.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/invitation-public-forum-the-isa-and-the-police-reform-process-whats-next-after-pak-lah/
To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards of people - Emily Cox

Siphoning EPF money

On 'Why should Valuecap borrow from EPF?' Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud: MTUC condemns the government's move to bail out Valuecap to support the local stock market using RM5 billion from EPF, as the provident fund is the custodian of the workers' money and not some sort of ‘automated teller machine' for the government.
If at all the EPF were to lend its money to the government, it has to be under the condition that there be transparency and accountability in the activities for which the money has been purposed. We want to know who is doing what with the money that belongs to the workers. This is the hard-earned money of the workers, their retirement plan. How is this bailout plan going to benefit the workers? We also question the reason for this bailout. If the economic fundamentals in Malaysia are strong and reserves sufficient as has been stated several times by the government, then why is there a need to offer so much money to the GLCs? Second Finance Minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop should prove how the EPF would profit from this loan. Bernama had reported that Nor had given the assurance that the loan given out by EPF would reap profits for the fund judging from Valuecap's past performance. But where is the paperwork and calculations to show that this move will benefit the EPF? MTUC is concerned that the loan might be mismanaged or misused and this, in turn, would affect the returns for the contributors. Mere assurances are not enough. We want to proof that this RM5 billion will not go down the drain. (The writer is president, MTUC). Sharyn: The government wants to use our pension money to prop up the Malaysian stock market which is the playing field of the rich people. If so, the government must ensure that the EPF account holders - who are predominantly the poor to average citizens of Malaysia - be guaranteed all of our pension money with a compound 8% growth (interest). It's so selfish and sick of the government to use the poor's pension money to help the rich to make more money with all the risks taken by the poor/average citizen. We can better use the RM% billion loans to Valuecap for our children's education, shelter, medical bills etc. Why not get those rich people to prop up the share market instead? Why should they park their money overseas and gamble with our EPF money instead? Kumar14: Who is behind this Valuecap organisation? Why suddenly, this separate entity is allowed to access funds from the EPF? Are they capable enough to handle it or is it just another desperate and blind move? It has been a very infamous trend where the people's funds are channeled to a company for investment purposes and suddenly POP! the funds disappear and there is nobody to be held responsible but a RM2 shell company. Charge who? Sue whom? The RM2 company (just a registered name)? We have seen this many times. People in power and with connections allow such things to go through and reap/rob the people's wealth and then blame it on organisations which actually don't exist. What if a lot of EPF funds are looted via such scams and nobody is to be pointed at? Where will the government get the funds to replenish the EPF? The people are very bored, disappointed, angry and frustrated at seeing all these dumb and unaccounted for measures being allowed by the government with lame excuses. Please, somebody verify the true purpose, integrity and capability of anybody attempting to use the people's fund.

Raja Petra

Photobucket Ihsan dari blog Go!Malaysian http://gomalaysian.blogspot.com/


A prosperous future is indivisible from a firm commitment to the principles of distributive justice, the rule of law and a profound respect for human rights.

Email Address:



February 2008
« Jan   Mar »

Blog Stats

  • 117,854 hits
%d bloggers like this: