Justice For All Malaysia

Postal Voting Process is closer to a circus than a solemn process of deciding leadership for the nation

Posted on: March 3, 2008

Fuziah’s statement on the matter.

An aide of Fuziah confided with JFA Kuantan (Justice For All Kuantan) that the policemen got their ballot papers like children obtaining their workbooks from the teacher at their teacher’s table. It was rather noisy. One of them were allowed to take the ballot paper of his wife. The person in charge had told Fuziah Salleh that he was only engaging in showing that the police force are not coerced into choosing the BN candidate…(he was quick to add)…for example.
Well, the system in arriving at the outcome of the whole process of postal voting is much to be desired. An overhaul of the present system is wanting. In fact, there is an obvious absence of a real system that guaranteed no trace of threats and a complete freedom of choice for postal voters.


2 Responses to "Postal Voting Process is closer to a circus than a solemn process of deciding leadership for the nation"

yes, i agree with zarul.

we must have defensive and attacking strategies.

corruption (power and money)story= attacking (i mean, in a positive way. we tell people mismanagements by BN. government is associated with management.)

improvement plan= defensive. opposition must convince rakyat that they can govern the country/ disallow unfair policies being approved in the parliament (point to say ‘we must deny 2/3 majority by BN’)/ future plans in details.

how about corporate sector? what are pkr/ opposition manifesto for them?

in campaigning, we must target all people. yes, the petrol issue is for all rakyat but it’s only (maybe) attractive to poor rakyat not the wealthy rakyat.

many of BN voters comes from businessman/ women, banking sector, glc etc

we campaign not only to existing opposition voters and fence-sitters BUT also to BN supporters and voters.

malaysians still have mentality of rejecting perubahan because they afraid of future life (some say ‘if i vote for BN, life will be easier…continuous developments from previous ruling party ‘). if opposition can highlight one or two countries that have seen change in government (ruling party), the rakyat will be more confidence.

some of the rakyat right now say “this is crazy talk. we want to have a new government (ruling party)? impossible”

you can also shout out your plans if got elected as a ruling party. perhaps you can say, you will choose ministers according to races percentage in malaysia. i made analysis in my blog, here’s the link http://utterance-monolog.blogspot.com/2008/02/my-comment-for-entry-titled-im-not-sure.html

“2004 malaysia cabinet members is also (approx) based on the percentage basis. by calculation, malay ministers= 18, chinese=8, indian= 2 and bumi=2. in reality (2004 line up), malay minister=22, chinese=6, indian=1 and bumi=2. ”

pkr is party for all races not like pas (malays) and dap (chinese). pkr can take first step among the opposition to bring forward idea of power sharing.

BN component parties= SPR , umno, mic, mca, ppp….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Must Attend Program

Please go to this link: https://justice4allkuantan.wordpress.com/2008/10/25/invitation-public-forum-the-isa-and-the-police-reform-process-whats-next-after-pak-lah/
To sin by silence when we should protest makes cowards of people - Emily Cox

Siphoning EPF money

On 'Why should Valuecap borrow from EPF?' Syed Shahir Syed Mohamud: MTUC condemns the government's move to bail out Valuecap to support the local stock market using RM5 billion from EPF, as the provident fund is the custodian of the workers' money and not some sort of ‘automated teller machine' for the government.
If at all the EPF were to lend its money to the government, it has to be under the condition that there be transparency and accountability in the activities for which the money has been purposed. We want to know who is doing what with the money that belongs to the workers. This is the hard-earned money of the workers, their retirement plan. How is this bailout plan going to benefit the workers? We also question the reason for this bailout. If the economic fundamentals in Malaysia are strong and reserves sufficient as has been stated several times by the government, then why is there a need to offer so much money to the GLCs? Second Finance Minister Nor Mohamed Yakcop should prove how the EPF would profit from this loan. Bernama had reported that Nor had given the assurance that the loan given out by EPF would reap profits for the fund judging from Valuecap's past performance. But where is the paperwork and calculations to show that this move will benefit the EPF? MTUC is concerned that the loan might be mismanaged or misused and this, in turn, would affect the returns for the contributors. Mere assurances are not enough. We want to proof that this RM5 billion will not go down the drain. (The writer is president, MTUC). Sharyn: The government wants to use our pension money to prop up the Malaysian stock market which is the playing field of the rich people. If so, the government must ensure that the EPF account holders - who are predominantly the poor to average citizens of Malaysia - be guaranteed all of our pension money with a compound 8% growth (interest). It's so selfish and sick of the government to use the poor's pension money to help the rich to make more money with all the risks taken by the poor/average citizen. We can better use the RM% billion loans to Valuecap for our children's education, shelter, medical bills etc. Why not get those rich people to prop up the share market instead? Why should they park their money overseas and gamble with our EPF money instead? Kumar14: Who is behind this Valuecap organisation? Why suddenly, this separate entity is allowed to access funds from the EPF? Are they capable enough to handle it or is it just another desperate and blind move? It has been a very infamous trend where the people's funds are channeled to a company for investment purposes and suddenly POP! the funds disappear and there is nobody to be held responsible but a RM2 shell company. Charge who? Sue whom? The RM2 company (just a registered name)? We have seen this many times. People in power and with connections allow such things to go through and reap/rob the people's wealth and then blame it on organisations which actually don't exist. What if a lot of EPF funds are looted via such scams and nobody is to be pointed at? Where will the government get the funds to replenish the EPF? The people are very bored, disappointed, angry and frustrated at seeing all these dumb and unaccounted for measures being allowed by the government with lame excuses. Please, somebody verify the true purpose, integrity and capability of anybody attempting to use the people's fund.

Raja Petra

Photobucket Ihsan dari blog Go!Malaysian http://gomalaysian.blogspot.com/


A prosperous future is indivisible from a firm commitment to the principles of distributive justice, the rule of law and a profound respect for human rights.

Email Address:



March 2008
« Feb   Apr »

Blog Stats

  • 117,854 hits
%d bloggers like this: